Thursday, March 28, 2013

The Proof is in the Pudding...or Fish Stocks




Source: NOAA
       The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has recently completed a study on fish stocks off of the coast of California.  NOAA found that not only was there an increase in hauls, but an increase in monetary value to the fishermen. Why the increase?  NOAA hypothesizes it was because of the catch limits that were implemented in 1996.  Why is this important?  The fact that fish stocks are rebuilding is not only important for the species of fish, but it is important economically.  California is one of five states that produced the greatest number of occupations from fishing, according to NOAA.  According to the National Ocean Economics Program, overall fishing has created 1.7 million jobs across the United States.  In order to keep fishing communities vibrant, the oceans must be full of viable fish stocks. 

       Even more promising news is that California scientists have seen the average physical size of several key species increase since the creation of the marine protected areas in California.  Marine protected areas create a plethora of habitats that are necessary for fish growth and biodiversity.
      
       Although there were certain restrictions on fishing to get fish stocks to this point, these findings can show a glimmer of hope.  While there have been some fishermen put out of business because of fishing restrictions, there were fisheries that were in danger before catch limits were implemented. Conversations must continue on fisheries management in order to create the best solutions to bring back important species of fish.
  
Source: White House
       Congress is doing just that with the re-authorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA).  During March, Congress held a hearing on the MSA where they invited witnesses from different sectors of the fishery, from fishing associations,fishermen, and fish processors.  All were in agreement that the MSA is a good tool for fishery management, but some refining must be done to  include the input and opinions of all user groups. 

       We should think to the future and how to best manage fisheries resources to provide a future of food and jobs for the United States.  Marine Conservation Institute will continue to keep you updated on new information as it pertains to marine conservation issues in our oceans and in Congress.  Also, please tell us what your thoughts are about the MSA and how important the rebuilding of fish stocks is to you!

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

A blog to save the Earth 8. Exclusive interview with the two-headed shark

As an observer of the sea and its life, I always want to report on the latest ocean stories while they’re hot. Yesterday the media learned that a fisherman had found a two-headed pre-term bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas). Realizing that it had a most unusual perspective on the world, I managed to obtain the shark’s cell phone number and recorded the following interview.


EN: How do you want to be addressed?

Bull shark: We agreed to come out as what we are.  Heads matter more than bodies or tails, so we want to be addressed as SarahJean.

EN: How does it feel to be a shark?

Sarah: Fantastic.  I wasn’t actually born before making my media debut, but I can tell you it’s so cool watching other marine life running for cover!  I’m going love being an apex predator.
 
Adult bull sharks are apex predators
Photo by Michael AW

EN: Jean, how do you feel about being a shark?

Jean: With all due respect to my sister, it’s scary.  While in utero, I read that people kill huge numbers of sharks — between 63 million and 273 million per year.

EN: Bull sharks are among the most dangerous sharks to humans.  What would you like as your first meal?

Sarah: I’m really fond of fish, I admit.  I’ve heard flatfish are tasty.  I’m going to love young skates and rays, and I’ve heard that lionfish are delicious too.  Very exotic!  I’ll have a taste for carrion too.

EN: What about people?

Sarah: Too much trouble.  The rubber and metal are bad for my teeth.  And you guys are really vengeful.  Do you have any idea how many idiots think the actions of a few sharks makes us all bad?

Jean: I don’t eat people; eating people is wrong. In fact I don’t know what to eat any more.  So many things have been overfished now, or are caught and discarded by trawlers and longliners that I can’t decide what to eat.  What do you eat?

EN: Please!  I’m the one who asks the questions; you’re the story.  But since you asked, I eat only sustainable seafood. 

Jean: Are we safe now, or are we going to wind up as dried fins in China?

EN: I wish I could answer that.  I wish I could.
  
Elliott Norse, Founder and Chief Scientist, Marine Conservation Institute